Reviews and Previews

All Game Guide
By: Ted Smith, [3/5]. "To a certain extent, when you've played one, you've played them all."
http://www.allgame.com/cg/agg.dll?p=agg&SQL=GRH||||25029

Electronic Playground
By: Mark H. Walker, [8.5/10]. "Combines a top-notch economic/civic model, attractive graphics, and solid real-time combat to give gamers a slice of Chinese history." <small>(April 26, 2001)</small>
http://www.elecplay.com/reviews_article.php?article=5629

GameZone.com
By: Michael Lafferty, [8/10]. "As solid a game as there is on the market, and a nice introduction to players to have never ventured into this realm. It is a good program, and quite enjoyable." <small>(April 5, 2001)</small>
http://www.gamezone.com/gzreviews/r15377.htm

GameSpot
By: Elliott Chin, [7.4/10]. "Ultimately, unless the historical Chinese context interests you, you'll find that Fate of the Dragon is just another real-time strategy game with a few original features, but with nothing really outstanding to recommend it." <small>(April 3, 2001)</small>
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/fateofthedragon/review.html

GameSpy.com
By: Tim McConnaughy, [88/100]. "Fate of the Dragon raises the bar on the RTS genre while keeping things simple enough for new gamers." Also has screenshots. <small>(April, 2001)</small>
http://archive.gamespy.com/reviews/april01/fotd/

IGN.com
By: Dan Adams, [8/10]. "There isn't a lot of variety in the units (just slight adjustments depending on your warlord), the graphics aren't the best you'll ever see, and the sound is hit and miss, but if you are looking to try something with some cool new features, this may be for you." <small>(March 30, 2001)</small>
http://pc.ign.com/articles/164/164372p1.html?fromint=1

GameOver
By: Fwiffo, 77%. "If you can get past this threshold, there is a gem underneath, if only a little unpolished." <small>(March 15, 2001)</small>
http://www.game-over.net/reviews.php?id=454&page=reviews